Serveur d'exploration sur la musique en Sarre

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Knowledge Acquisition Strategies and Company Performance in Young High Technology Companies

Identifieur interne : 000254 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000253; suivant : 000255

Knowledge Acquisition Strategies and Company Performance in Young High Technology Companies

Auteurs : Martin Friesl [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:599F78458B65C341B9302EAE8C81B6A92EDF02EB

English descriptors

Abstract

Research on knowledge strategies argues that the configuration of activities used by companies to acquire new and leverage existing knowledge is an important influencing factor of company performance. However, we do not know very much about how companies actually structure knowledge acquisition. In addition, we do not know which configurations of knowledge acquisition are conducive to company performance. Furthermore, knowledge strategies have largely been neglected in the context of young and entrepreneurial companies. Drawing on an explorative analysis of quantitative and qualitative data, we investigate strategies and activities for knowledge acquisition in the context of young biotechnology companies in Germany. The study reveals four distinct knowledge acquisition strategies (low key, mid range, focus and explorer) and shows that these strategies differ in their relation to company performance as a result of their configuration of knowledge acquisition activities and the type of knowledge acquired.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00742.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Knowledge Acquisition Strategies and Company Performance in Young High Technology Companies</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Friesl, Martin" sort="Friesl, Martin" uniqKey="Friesl M" first="Martin" last="Friesl">Martin Friesl</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:599F78458B65C341B9302EAE8C81B6A92EDF02EB</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00742.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/599F78458B65C341B9302EAE8C81B6A92EDF02EB/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000950</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000950</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000900</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000124</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000124</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1045-3172:2012:Friesl M:knowledge:acquisition:strategies</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000254</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000254</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000254</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Knowledge Acquisition Strategies and Company Performance in Young High Technology Companies</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Friesl, Martin" sort="Friesl, Martin" uniqKey="Friesl M" first="Martin" last="Friesl">Martin Friesl</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centre for Strategic Management, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YX</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Lancaster LA1 4YX</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">British Journal of Management</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1045-3172</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-8551</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2012-09">2012-09</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="325">325</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="343">343</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1045-3172</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">599F78458B65C341B9302EAE8C81B6A92EDF02EB</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00742.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">BJOM742</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1045-3172</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Absorptive</term>
<term>Absorptive capacity</term>
<term>Acquisition</term>
<term>Activity categories</term>
<term>Administrative science</term>
<term>Analyse</term>
<term>Average company performance</term>
<term>Average performance</term>
<term>Benchmarking</term>
<term>Bergmann lichtenstein</term>
<term>Bierly</term>
<term>Biotechnology</term>
<term>Biotechnology industry</term>
<term>Biotechnology sector</term>
<term>British academy</term>
<term>British journal</term>
<term>Business development</term>
<term>Business model</term>
<term>Business performance</term>
<term>Chakrabarti</term>
<term>Christman</term>
<term>Clinical trials</term>
<term>Cluster analysis</term>
<term>Collaborative</term>
<term>Combinative capabilities</term>
<term>Common method variance</term>
<term>Companies lack turnover</term>
<term>Company performance</term>
<term>Competitive advantage</term>
<term>Competitive environment</term>
<term>Complementary</term>
<term>Complementary knowledge</term>
<term>Conceptual basis</term>
<term>Conceptual paper</term>
<term>Control variables</term>
<term>Current position</term>
<term>Data analysis</term>
<term>Descriptive codes</term>
<term>Descriptive statistics</term>
<term>Distinct knowledge acquisition strategies</term>
<term>Dynamic capabilities</term>
<term>Entrepreneurship theory</term>
<term>Exploratory factor analysis</term>
<term>Explorer strategies</term>
<term>Explorer strategy</term>
<term>Extant literature</term>
<term>External advice</term>
<term>Factor analysis</term>
<term>Focus strategies</term>
<term>Friesl</term>
<term>Full model</term>
<term>Functional areas</term>
<term>Functional knowledge</term>
<term>Future research</term>
<term>German biotechnology industry</term>
<term>Greater detail</term>
<term>Head biotechnology</term>
<term>Hibbert</term>
<term>High level</term>
<term>Huxham</term>
<term>Industry trends</term>
<term>Informal contacts</term>
<term>Internal processes</term>
<term>Interorganizational collaboration</term>
<term>Interview data</term>
<term>Interview data show</term>
<term>Interviewee</term>
<term>Knowledge acquisition</term>
<term>Knowledge acquisition activities</term>
<term>Knowledge acquisition categories</term>
<term>Knowledge acquisition results</term>
<term>Knowledge acquisition strategies</term>
<term>Knowledge acquisition strategy</term>
<term>Knowledge base</term>
<term>Knowledge categories</term>
<term>Knowledge creation</term>
<term>Knowledge gaps</term>
<term>Knowledge management</term>
<term>Knowledge strategies</term>
<term>Knowledge transfer</term>
<term>Knowledge types</term>
<term>Lancaster university management school</term>
<term>Legal aspects</term>
<term>Leverage</term>
<term>Management journal</term>
<term>Management review</term>
<term>Management studies</term>
<term>Market orientation</term>
<term>Mcmullan</term>
<term>Multiple regression analysis</term>
<term>Nance</term>
<term>Nancing round</term>
<term>Ndings</term>
<term>Next step</term>
<term>Organization science</term>
<term>Organizational</term>
<term>Organizational capabilities</term>
<term>Organizational change</term>
<term>Organizational performance</term>
<term>Other biotechnology companies</term>
<term>Other clusters</term>
<term>Other companies</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Overall sample</term>
<term>Patent situation</term>
<term>Performance criteria</term>
<term>Performance impact</term>
<term>Performance implications</term>
<term>Performance measure</term>
<term>Performance measurement</term>
<term>Pharmaceutical</term>
<term>Pharmaceutical companies</term>
<term>Pharmaceutical value chain</term>
<term>Product development</term>
<term>Qualitative</term>
<term>Qualitative data</term>
<term>Qualitative data analysis</term>
<term>Qualitative research</term>
<term>Quantitative analysis</term>
<term>Quantitative data</term>
<term>Range strategy</term>
<term>Recent research</term>
<term>Research design</term>
<term>Research methods</term>
<term>Research process</term>
<term>Role models</term>
<term>Several iterations</term>
<term>Single activities</term>
<term>Single factor</term>
<term>Small business management</term>
<term>Strategic alliances</term>
<term>Strategic implications</term>
<term>Strategic knowledge</term>
<term>Strategic management</term>
<term>Strategic management journal</term>
<term>Strategy</term>
<term>Strong focus</term>
<term>Success factors</term>
<term>Supplementary knowledge</term>
<term>Support structures</term>
<term>Technological expertise</term>
<term>Technological knowledge</term>
<term>Technological knowledge base</term>
<term>Technology companies</term>
<term>Theme analysis</term>
<term>Various activities</term>
<term>Venture capitalists</term>
<term>Venture performance</term>
<term>Venture survival</term>
<term>Young biotechnology companies</term>
<term>Young companies</term>
<term>Young company</term>
<term>Young company performance</term>
<term>Young technology companies</term>
<term>Zollo</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Research on knowledge strategies argues that the configuration of activities used by companies to acquire new and leverage existing knowledge is an important influencing factor of company performance. However, we do not know very much about how companies actually structure knowledge acquisition. In addition, we do not know which configurations of knowledge acquisition are conducive to company performance. Furthermore, knowledge strategies have largely been neglected in the context of young and entrepreneurial companies. Drawing on an explorative analysis of quantitative and qualitative data, we investigate strategies and activities for knowledge acquisition in the context of young biotechnology companies in Germany. The study reveals four distinct knowledge acquisition strategies (low key, mid range, focus and explorer) and shows that these strategies differ in their relation to company performance as a result of their configuration of knowledge acquisition activities and the type of knowledge acquired.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Friesl, Martin" sort="Friesl, Martin" uniqKey="Friesl M" first="Martin" last="Friesl">Martin Friesl</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000254 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000254 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sarre
   |area=    MusicSarreV3
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:599F78458B65C341B9302EAE8C81B6A92EDF02EB
   |texte=   Knowledge Acquisition Strategies and Company Performance in Young High Technology Companies
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Sun Jul 15 18:16:09 2018. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 19:21:25 2024